Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Be thankful for two things: These women fought for your right to vote, and you don't have to dress like this.
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(106)
-
▼
February
(24)
- Obama administration changes a rule
- No credit for commenting on this entry
- speaking of the decline of print media...
- A bizarre first amendment case
- Who did the Obamas invite to the speech last night?
- Categorical funding in CA schools
- Taxation without Representation
- Your Fed Chairman
- Still no budget for California
- Presidential quiz
- Looking for someone to blame?
- I almost forgot!
- Happy birthday to...
- Congratulations!
- "state secrets" privilege
- We're going to have a stimulus bill...probably.
- Bill Gates + mosquitoes =
- Rich people's tax problems
- Baked goods and bipartisanship
- No Secretary Daschle
- Can we blame the recession on men?
- Kurtz article about Palin, Blagojevich, AND Kennedy
- Iraqis voted last week
- An interesting article
-
▼
February
(24)
1 comment:
Obama's decision to change this rule was fair but a dangerous political move. Many people in favor of this decision believed that it was a great advancement in the reproductive rights of women. Those who were against this change called it a setback in religious freedom. The article states that this might cause some conservatives to lose their faith in any chances of compromise with the Obama administration. This decision would overturn one made by the Bush administration that cut off funding to medical places that did not accommodate medical staff who objected against certain types of care or medical procedures. This is a very controversial rule and there is no way that everyone will be pleased in this situation. This rule, I believe, will at least ensure that people are getting the medical care that they only need but want.
Post a Comment